Articles Files Videos Sites Bookstores Classes Categories Critique Services
Ads Blogs Donate
21.03.2015 13:15    Comments: 0    Categories: Writing Resources      Tags: ralph g. brockett  writing book reviews  
Tips for the Practitioner on Writing Book Reviews 

by Ralph G. Brockett, Assistant Professor, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 

Keeping up with professional literature is an almost impossible task. Most of us, regardless of the 
setting in which we practice, do not have the time to carefully read and digest the majority of books 
published in a given year. Thus, the book review becomes a vital tool for the adult education practi- 
tioner and those who can master the technique of book reviewing are in a position to provide a most 
valuable service to other practitioners. Professors are not the only individuals who can offer useful book 
reviews. In fact, the practitioner may often be the most appropriate person to review books about practice. 

Jerold Apps has stated that "a book review is much more than a book report." In developing a book 
review, one needs to provide an appropriate balance between description and analysis. In other words, 
it is the job of the reviewer to both describe the main points of the book and to offer a critical analysis 
of the strengths and weaknesses of the work. The purpose of a book review is to provide the reader with 
information so that he or she can make a decision about whether to read the book itself. The following 
tips may be helpful to the practitioner when writing a book review. 

1. Read the book carefully. It is not enough to merely skim sections of the book. In fact, it is often 
wise to read the book more than once. Take notes the first time through; this can make it easier to 
refer back to those portions of the book that had special impact during the initial reading. 

2. Examine book reviews that have appeared in various publications. Some journals prefer renews that 
are short and somewhat direct while others seek a more detailed, scholariy review. When writing the 
review, be sure to bear in mind the background of the audience for the publication to which your review 
is targeted. 

3. Try to avoid the temptation to read other reviews of the book that you are currently reviewing. It 
can be easy to let other viewpoints color your impressions. Besides, it is interesting to be able to "com- 
pare notes" with other reviewers after your own review is complete. 

4. Describe the content of the book in enough detail so that the reader is informed of the major points 
covered but don t steal the author's thunder by giving a "blow-by-blow"* account. Remember, the review 
is not intended to replace the book; rather, it is a tool that readers can use in making an informed 
decision about whether to pursue the book further. 

5. When critiquing a book, address both its major strengths and weaknesses. Don't assume that because 
the author is an expert in the field, the book is above criticism. At the same time, don't feel obligated 
to find flaws where they don't exist. In other words, read the book with an open mind and offer both 
praise and criticism when appropriate. 


Techniques can be reproduced without permission for use in workshops or general 
dissemination to staff If you have an idea for Techniques, write for guidelines. 

6. Some things to look for when reviewing a book include the following: 

A. WRITING STYLE— Is the book written in an appropriate style for the intended target audience? 

B. ORGANIZATION —Does the book flow smoothly between paragraphs, sections, and chapters? 
Do ideas build on one another? 

C. PURPOSE— Does the book achieve its purpose as stated in the introduction or preface? 

D. SUBSTANCE— h the book a comprehensive treatment of the topic? To what extent have major 
theories, research, issues, or practices related to the topic been included? If the book is a report of original 
research, are the methodology and procedures appropriate? 

7. In most instances, you should conclude your review with an overall assessment of the book. How 
well did it achieve its primary purpose(s)? For whom would you recommend the book? 

8. After developing your first draft* go back and revise your review. Try to omit any unnecessary words 
or phrases. In general, try to tighten up the review. Some writers find that several drafts are necessary. 
Others are comfortable with two or three drafts. There are no firm guidelines; probably the best guide 
is knowledge of your own approach to writing. 

9. Book reviewing is an important responsibility that should not be taken lightly. If published, your 
review is likely to influence a large number of people; therefore, it is crucial that the review be both 
fair and thoughtful. This docs not mean that you should hold back on criticism when appropriate. It 
does mean, however, that you need to do a responsible and thorough job in describing the book, stating 
what you like and dislike about it and why. 

Book reviewing is one of the most effective ways for a new author to be published. More important, 
the practitioner who reviews the books is providing a valuable service to the field. Indeed, book review- 
ing is a technique well worth mastering. 


Apps. J. (1982). Improving your writing skills, Chicago: Follett. Kamerman. S.E. (1978). 
Book reviewing. Boston: The Writer, Inc
Order by: 
Per page: 
  • There are no comments yet

Visit our online bookstores:

  1. Kindle's Free eBook Store
  2. Fiction Writer's Bookstore
  3. Romance Writer's Bookstore


Socialpolitan.org is in Association with Amazon.com

0 votes


Jobs from Indeed
Socialpolitan: Fiction Writing Gpix Advertising. Become A Pixel Owner. Learn how your ad could be here.

If this page has been of any value to you, we would appreciate if you help us by spreading the word. Join Fiction Writing Craft on Facebook Join Fiction Writing Craft on Twitter Follow Us

Please take a moment and vote for us at Writer's Digest 101 Best Writing Sites. Thanks!